[00:00:08]
SORRY. IT IS 133. WE CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. CAN WE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE? PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. ALL RIGHT.
[III. CONSENT ITEMS]
HAVE YOU HAD TIME TO LOOK OVER THE MEETINGS FROM JULY 16TH? I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? THERE'S A SECOND DISCUSSION. NO DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH[IV. PUBLIC HEARING]
OUR FIRST CASE FILE. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-02-AZ. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST. BY ELSIE A ON BEHALF OF D, J, K INCORPORATED AND B HOMES LLC, PROPERTY OWNERS FOR ORIGINAL ZONING UPON ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 304.76 ACRES OF VACANT LAND CONSISTING OF 27.57 ACRES OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, 4026 ACRES OF LIGHT COMMERCIAL, AND 236.9 ACRES OF SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN SECTION 12, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY. MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS, GENERALLY EAST OF MIDWAY BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 1355FT SOUTH OF YUKON ROAD. COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO. THANK YOU, MISTER CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. THE APPLICANT, ELSIE ON BEHALF OF DJK INC. AND B HOMES, IS REQUESTING ORIGINAL ZONING UPON ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 304.76 ACRES TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED MASTER PLAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY CONSISTING OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND EMPLOYMENT USES. THE 304.76 ACRES IS BROKEN DOWN IN THIS MANNER. 27.57 ACRES IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, 40.26 ACRES IS LIGHT COMMERCIAL AND 236.93 ACRES TO BE ASSIGNED AS SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 1295 RESIDENTIAL LOTS. IT WILL BE CONSIDERED COTTAGE CORE AND RESERVE HOUSING PRODUCTS. THE DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES NEIGHBORHOOD POCKET PARKS, TRAILS, OPEN SPACE, PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITY EASEMENTS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND SUPPORTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPLICANT'S CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ILLUSTRATING THE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. IT DEPICTS THE APPLICANT'S CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AND IS PROVIDED IN SUPPORT OF THE ZONING REQUEST. APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED ZONING DOES NOT INCORPORATE THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN INTO ZONING DISTRICT OR REQUIRE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR SUBSTANTIALLY AS DEPICTED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF SPD DISTRICT, THE CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ODESSA. CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A MASTER PLAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGNED TO CREATE A COORDINATED COMMUNITY THAT INCLUDES A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING PRODUCTS, SUPPORTED BY NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, OPEN SPACE PARKS, TRAILS AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS ARE HAVE BEEN EVALUATED INDIVIDUALLY AS FOLLOWS. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. THAT IS THE 27.57 ACRES OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING. THE STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IS NOT THE MOST APPROPRIATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS LOCATION. WHILE THE APPLICANT PROPOSES EMPLOYMENT GENERATING USES AS PART OF THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT, THE REQUESTED INDUSTRIAL TRACT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COMMUNITY THAT IS PREDOMINANTLY PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. AS THE AREA DEVELOPS, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS ARE EXPECTED TO BECOME THE PRIMARY SURROUNDING LAND USE. THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PERMITS INDUSTRIAL USES THAT MAY GENERATE INCREASED TRUCK TRAFFIC, FREIGHT MOVEMENT LOADING OPERATIONS, OUTDOOR STORAGE, OUTDOOR STORAGE AND OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT MAY NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. ACCORDINGLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE REQUEST. STAFF FINDS THAT A LESS IMPACTFUL ZONING DISTRICT IS MORE[00:05:03]
APPROPRIATE AND COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, AS IT WOULD BETTER SUPPORT THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES ENVISIONED FOR THIS AREA. I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU THAT THIS LOCATION, THIS AREA THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO ZONE IS CONNECTED TO THE ODYSSEY PROJECT, WHICH WAS PRESENTED IN THE PAST PNC MEETING TWO WEEKS AGO. I'M SORRY, WAS IT TWO WEEKS AGO WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED? YES. OKAY. AND LIGHT COMMERCIAL ZONING FOR 40.26 ACRES. STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE LOCATION AND IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR RETAIL, OFFICE, PERSONAL SERVICE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES THAT WILL SUPPORT FUTURE RESIDENTS WHILE CREATING AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SURROUNDING LAND USES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED ZONING FOR THE 40.26 ACRE TRACT FOR THE SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. THE 236.93 ACRES ZONING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN. MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THIS INCLUDES A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS WE HAD INDICATED, AND IT'S GOING TO BE INCLUDING APPROXIMATELY 1295 RESIDENTIAL LOTS OF COTTAGE CORE AND RESERVE HOUSING PRODUCTS. APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED ZONING ESTABLISHES ONLY THE PERMITTED LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE SPD. DISTRICT.STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF SPD. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHOULD CONSIDER THE APPLICATION STAFF ANALYSIS, APPLICABLE, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND PUBLIC TESTIMONY BEFORE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. BASED ON STAFF'S REVIEW, THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PROVIDED.
WE RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE REQUESTED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING FOR 27.57 ACRE TRACT.
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL ZONING FOR THE 40.26 ACRE TRACT, AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPD SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. ZONING FOR THE 236.93 ACRE TRACT. I WOULD LIKE TO INDICATE THAT IF DENIED THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY REVERT TO A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, IN WHICH CASE THE APPLICANT CAN COME BACK AND REZONE OR PERMANENTLY ZONE THIS AREA. I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DO WE KNOW, BASED ON THE MAP, WHERE THOSE. THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WOULD GO? SO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WOULD GO TO SEE. CAN YOU PLACE THE OVERALL MAP OR PLAN? YES. SO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. IT'S TO THE. YOU SEE TO THE LEFT SIDE. IT'S LABELED ON THERE, BUT NOT ON OURS. IT'S IT'S IT'S LABELED ON THE SCREEN, BUT NOT OURS. SO IT'S TO THE LEFT SIDE WHERE THAT. OH I SEE RIGHT HERE ELSIE.
THANK YOU. I SEE IT NOW. THANK YOU. THAT'S LITTLE. CAN'T HARDLY SEE. WE TRY TO PUT IT IN A BIGGER ONE BUT YOU'RE FINE. OKAY. OKAY. SO YOU'RE. RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE OTHER TWO PARTS BUT NOT OF THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, CORRECT? YES. AND IF YOU DO, YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? ALL RIGHT. AT THIS MOMENT WE'RE GOING TO OPEN SECTION OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WILL SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. JOHN LANDGRAF 521, NORTH TEXAS.
I CAN ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, BUT ALSO WOULD LIKE TO GO BACK TO THAT MAP THAT THEY JUST HAD UP SO I CAN EXPLAIN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ONE THERE. THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS ADJACENT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS IN MIDLAND COUNTY. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER WHAT NEW ROAD IT WAS CALLED NEW ROAD FOR ON ALL THE MASTER PLANS.
IT'S NOW MIDWAY DRIVE AND IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND IT'S EXTENDING COUNTY ROAD 1295.
THAT'S AT A BI20. US OLD FOLKS CALL THAT HIGHWAY 80, BUT FROM BI20 UP TO YUKON ROAD AND ALL OF IT'S 100% DEVELOPED BETWEEN HIGHWAY 80BI20 AND BANKHEAD HIGHWAY AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
[00:10:09]
AND THEN THIS JUST PICKS UP AT THAT POINT AND CONTINUES FOR A FEW ACRES THERE, 27 ACRES ALONG.NEW FOR OR MIDWAY DRIVE MIDWAY. AND THEN THE THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL THERE IS THEN ALONG WHAT YUKON, WHAT'S NOW YUKON ROAD THAT'S BUILT. AND WITH THESE PROJECTS, IT'S GOING TO BE WIDENED TO A FULL FIVE LANE ROADWAY. SO THE OTHER 40 ACRES OR. YES, 40. AND THAT THAT IS WHERE FROM OUR PREVIOUS MEETING OR IS IT STILL THE SAME PLANNED TENANTS THERE OR, OR WHO THAT WOULD BE SOLD TO LIKE WARREN CAT AND, AND COLD STORAGE TYPE FACILITIES. THERE ARE A FEW THINGS THAT ARE NOT ALLOWED IN LIGHT COMMERCIAL, IN LIGHT COMMERCIAL THAT ARE IN LIGHT.
INDUSTRIAL IS THE REASON THEY WANTED TO DO THAT. AND THE JC REPRESENTATIVES ARE HERE.
THEY'RE WILLING TO PUT IN SOME DEED RESTRICTIONS. I KNOW THE CITY DOES NOT ENFORCE DEED RESTRICTIONS, BUT THEY'RE WILLING TO PUT THOSE IN TO WHERE IT WOULD LOOK ALMOST EXACTLY LIKE WHAT YOU HAVE ON JBS PARKWAY BETWEEN THE RAILROAD AND I-20 THERE, WHERE BUDWEISER IS FAB. CO FOREST BROTHERS GRAYBAR AND A COUPLE OF NICE HOTELS, AND SAULSBURY THERE ON THE CORNER. AND THAT IS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND THEN WHEN GROW ODESSA DEVELOPED THAT, THEY PUT THE DEED RESTRICTIONS IN TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT IT DIDN'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF BIG HEAVY NOISE GENERATING TYPE ACTIVITIES. SO ANYWAY, WANTED TO MAKE THAT PLEA AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? SO THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL ON THE MAP THERE THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY THING BACKING UP INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S A DRAINAGE CHANNEL THAT'S NOT SHOWN ON HERE. THAT IS BETWEEN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND THE RESIDENTIAL ON BOTH SIDES ACTUALLY. BUT WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT THIS CASE NOW. SO THERE IS A DRAINAGE CHANNEL THAT SEPARATES THE RESIDENT, THE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL, THE SPD THAT YOU'RE ZONING. THAT WOULD BE FROM FROM THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. YES. OKAY. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS. DID YOU SAY THAT THE MIDLAND COUNTY WAS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ALREADY? JUST TO THE NORTH OF THAT? NO, JUST SOUTH OF IT. JUST SOUTH OF IT.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, THIS PROPERTY, THE THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL TOUCHES BANKHEAD HIGHWAY. OKAY. OR THE THOSE BIG HIGH LINES THERE AT BANKHEAD HIGHWAY AND THEN FROM BANKHEAD HIGHWAY DOWN TO. YEAH. OKAY. DOWN TO HIGHWAY 80 BY 20 IS IT'S IT'S DEVELOPED OUT IN THE COUNTY. SO IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY REAL ZONING. IT'S IN MIDLAND COUNTY, BUT THE USES ARE ALL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. IF YOU HAVE. ERIC, DO YOU HAVE AERIAL? CAN WE GO TO GOOGLE EARTH OR ANYTHING? I CAN EASILY I THINK YOU CAN SEE THAT ON. YEAH, I'M LOOKING AT IT. OKAY.
YEAH. I PULLED UP THE MAP ON MY OWN WHILE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT IT. YEAH. AND THERE IS THERE, THERE IS A OVERHEAD POWER LINE ALSO BETWEEN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THAT PARALLELS.
WHAT STREET IS THIS? SO THIS, THIS STREET HERE IS WHAT COMES IN THROUGH BUSINESS 20. SORRY, I'M POINTING AT MY OWN PAPER. SO SO THIS IS THIS IS BUSINESS. 20 RIGHT. IS THIS IS THIS B20 IS THAT BUSINESS. 20 THAT RIGHT OUTSIDE THAT IS, THAT IS MIDWAY, MIDWAY MIDWAY. CORRECT. AND IT GOES FROM I-20 BI20 UP TO, TO YUKON ROAD. SO WHAT ALL, WHAT ALL BUSINESSES ARE OUT THERE ALREADY ON THAT 20 AND THAT KIND OF BUTTS UP RIGHT TO IT'S YOUR WATER WONDERLAND, WHICH IS NOW. YEAH, A TANK LOGISTICS, I BELIEVE. YEAH. AND THERE'S A FULL 130FT OF RIGHT OF WAY THERE THAT WAS PLANNED MANY YEARS AGO FOR THIS NEW ROAD. AND IT WAS ON ALL TEXDOT AND MIDLAND COUNTIES. MASTER PLANS CALLED NEW ROAD FOR. AND IT ACTUALLY GOES IN AND TIES INTO 191 NEAR WHERE THE CROSS IS NOW. RIGHT. AND THERE'S A RIGHT OF WAY BEEN SET ASIDE FOR A GRADE
[00:15:02]
SEPARATION THERE ON 191. YEAH. THERE WE GO. OKAY. YOU CAN SEE CLEARLY THAT THAT RED LINE IS, IS THE CURRENT CITY LIMIT LINE. AND IT ALSO RUNS ABOUT WHERE MIDWAY DOES. AND, AND YOU CAN SEE SOUTH THAT THIS IS LIKE RIGHT HERE ALL THE WAY DOWN TO I-20 OR BI20 THAT THAT'S FULLY DEVELOPED IN THERE WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND SO WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT LITTLE PANHANDLE PIECE, RIGHT? AND THEN COME UP JUST A LITTLE BIT, JUST 20 SOMETHING 27 ACRES. SO IT'S NOT A BIG PIECE, BUT JUST THAT FRONTS AND IT'S CONTIGUOUS FOR WHAT'S THERE SOUTH OF THERE. SO I THINK THAT THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED LAST TIME WAS THAT THE, THE ROAD THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS BEEN PUT IN WAS FOR THE INTENT OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES, WHICH IS, I THINK, HOW WE CAME UP WITH OUR DECISION LAST TIME. SO, I MEAN, WHAT WHAT IS THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE USING THE OTHER ROAD THAT'S JUST BEEN PUT IN? THIS IS JUST SUCH A SMALL AMOUNT THAT IT'S REALLY NOT WHAT WE WERE THINKING LAST TIME. WELL, I THINK LAST TIME IT WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE. YEAH. IT'S RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. YEAH. SO THIS IS NOT AS BIG A DEAL WITH THIS. WE DIDN'T THINK SO. I MEAN AND IT IT IT TIES INTO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH.AND I KNOW THERE'S BEEN SOME THOUGHT WITH WITH STAFF AND WE'VE WE'VE TALKED WITH THEM AND EVERYTHING. THEY THEY DIDN'T PARTICULARLY LIKE THAT. BUT WE FELT LIKE THAT'S A BETTER THING THAT GENERATE SALES TAX AND THOSE TYPE OF THINGS. AND WE'RE GOSH, OVER A THOUSAND HOMES IN THE IN THE SPD THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. SO WE'RE PUTTING LOTS OF ROOFTOPS OUT THERE. AND THEN, AS YOU KNOW, D.R. HORTON'S ALREADY DOING SOME STUFF WEST OF THERE.
THE YELLOW THAT YOU SEE THERE. NOW, THAT SPD, A BIG PORTION OF THAT IS ROOFTOPS. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST. PLEASE STEP FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS BRETT BERINGER WITH BENBOW HOMES. OUR ADDRESS IS 1201 EAST 87TH STREET. I MAINLY JUST WANTED TO SHOW MY FACE AND LET Y'ALL KNOW THAT I'M HERE, BUT I HAVE ALSO PREPARED A PRESENTATION IF Y'ALL WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT. SURE. OKAY, COOL. SO WE'RE SUPER EXCITED TO BRING THIS TO THE CITY OF ODESSA. I JUST CLICK THIS BUTTON. YEAH. OKAY.
LIKE I SAID, OVER 1000 HOMES, 1293 AND JUST, I MEAN, Y'ALL KNOW THE AREA, RIGHT? BETWEEN 191 OFF OF YUKON ROAD BETWEEN BUSINESS 20 IN THIS. OH, THAT GOT MESSED UP A LITTLE BIT. WE WILL HAVE OUR COTTAGE LOTS, WHICH MAKE UP ROUGHLY LIKE 33% OF THE COMMUNITY. AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY'RE LAID OUT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THERE. WE WILL HAVE OUR CORE LOTS, WHICH WILL MAKE UP ABOUT 60% OF OUR COMMUNITY, AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY WILL BE LAID OUT THERE. AND THEN AS WELL AS OUR RESERVE LOTS, WHICH WILL MAKE UP ABOUT 7% OF OUR COMMUNITY AND OF COURSE, TOTALING 1293 HOMES FOR AMENITIES. WE'RE HAVING ALMOST ONE AND A HALF MILES OF WALKING TRAIL, WHICH IS AWESOME, WITH ALSO 14 ACRES OF ACTIVE OPEN SPACE. AND IT'S HARD TO SEE ON HERE. BUT THE LITTLE BLUE LINE IS ACTUALLY THE CONCEPT OF WHERE THE WILDCATTER TRAIL IS GOING TO BE. AND LIKE I SAY, THAT'S THE CONCEPT. SO BUT IN THE FUTURE, EASY ACCESS, EASY TIE IN. WE WOULD LOVE TO WORK WITH THE. MO MPO ON THAT. YEAH. FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, WE HAVE HAD SO MUCH OPPORTUNITY TO PARTNER WITH THE CITY. I SEE A AND SEVERAL OTHER ENTITIES TO PUT IN TWO AND A HALF MILES OF WATER LINE. AND AS I SAID, MIDWAY ROAD WILL BE A FIVE LANE ROAD, AND THEN I BELIEVE FROM 191 TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE GREEN LINE WILL BE A FIVE LANE ROAD. AND THEN AS FAR AS TAXES AND WHAT BENEFIT THIS BRINGS TO THE CITY, YOU'RE LOOKING AT ALMOST $2 MILLION IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUE. SO THAT'S AWESOME. THANK YOU. AND THAT'S ALL I HAD FOR Y'ALL. Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I DON'T THINK THE RESIDENTIAL I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY NO WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES. BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION OF COURSE. ANYBODY ELSE WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST. PLEASE STEP FORWARD IF THERE'S NOBODY ELSE. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE THIS SECTION OF THE MEETING STAFF.
OKAY. SO I WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND PROVIDE YOU WITH THE AGREEMENT WITH ODC, WHICH INDICATES THAT BOTH AREAS ON THE ROAD ARE INCLUDED IN THAT AGREEMENT. I THINK WE PRESENTED
[00:20:05]
THE SAME DOCUMENT LAST, LAST. IF YOU COULD ALSO SHOW WHICH ROAD IT IS ON THE MAP THAT THEY'VE PROVIDED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR OR THE FUNDING FOR. OH, THIS IS IT. I'M FOR WHATEVER.WE'RE STILL GOING TO BE FINE WITH THAT. SO OKAY, I THINK WE'RE STILL FINE IF WE JUST GO AHEAD AND JUST WE CAN STILL JUST GO ON. I THINK WE CAN STILL GO GOOD WITH THIS.
BECAUSE I DON'T SEE THIS. THEY'RE PROVIDING THEY'RE PROVIDING IT FOR THIS THIS RIGHT HERE. OKAY. DO YOU WANT TO SEE THIS? I CAN'T, I CAN'T TELL, BUT I THINK IT'S THIS RIGHT HERE, RIGHT? IS IT? SO IT'S THIS RIGHT HERE. OH, THIS OVER HERE. THE HOUSING ALL COMES IN THIS SIDE. YEAH. SO IT'S FOR THE HOUSING. IT DOESN'T WHERE JOHN IS SPOKE TO.
IT'S NOT THAT PART OF IT. YES IT IS. IT'S RIGHT HERE. IT'S THIS. BUT IS THIS COMING HERE.
AND LLI IS UP HERE. SO IS IT LIKE THIS. YEAH. WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. SO THIS LOWER SECTION I WAS TALKING ABOUT IS OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS. IT'S THE COUNTY. IT'S THE A FROM BANKHEAD TO BUSINESS 20. THIS IS HERE. RIGHT HERE. HEY, JOHN, CAN YOU COME HERE? CAN YOU COME SPEAK TO THIS? IS JOHN, WHAT SHE'S SHOWING US HERE. SO WE WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE'RE KIND OF DOWN HERE IS WHERE THE COMMERCIAL IS GOING TO BE. THAT'S LIKE COMMERCIAL BLACK COMMERCIAL. HERE IS WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND JUST FROM THAT, SHOW US ON THERE. SO SO YEAH, IF YOU DON'T MIND, SIR. SO THIS IS, THIS IS THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT WE'RE WANTING TO APPROVE. AND WHAT SHE'S TALKING ABOUT, WHERE OUR ODC BOARD IS APPROVED, THE MONEY. OKAY. IS APPROVED. I CAN'T SEE BUILDING. CAN YOU? YEAH. WELL, BECAUSE I THOUGHT, OH YEAH, HE MARKED IT. OKAY. I MEAN, I SAID ON THE ONE GROW ODESSA, BUT ARE WE GOING TO AFFECT OUR MONEY ANYWAY. NO, THIS IS NOT GROW ODESSA MONEY. IT'S NOT GROWING OUR ODC. OH.
ARE WE GOING TO AFFECT OUR OUR ODC MONEY IN ANY WAY IF WE MESS WITH THIS PROJECT? WE'RE NOT.
NO, I DIDN'T THINK SO. IF IF WE. AGREEMENT. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I'M THAT'S WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND. I. WE'RE NOT IT'S NOT GOING TO AFFECT OUR BOARD OUR MONEY ON THAT WAY. I DON'T I DON'T THINK SO. SHE SAYS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO BACK. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW WHY WE WOULD I DON'T SEE I DON'T I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU WANT TO BRING THAT UP. NO, WE DO NOT HAVE TO. BUT OKAY. HOLD ON. WE GOT A WE GOT A QUESTION HERE. WELL I'M GOING TO LET HIM FIND FIND WHAT HE'S LOOKING FOR FOR Y'ALL FIRST. OKAY. YEAH. JUST TO CLARIFY, WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK. I DIDN'T THINK WE HAD TO GO BACK, BUT THIS IS PROBABLY THE BEST OVERALL. THE THE GREEN IS THE RESIDENTIAL. THAT BEATING BOTH. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. SO WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE ROADS ON THE BOAT THING. I WAS JUST DOUBLE CHECKING ON ROADS TO MAKE SURE WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK ON ROADS IF WE APPROVE ANYTHING. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO. I DO NOT SEE. WE DO NOT KNOW. OKAY. SHOW US WHAT ODC PROVIDED ON THERE THAT NOW, THE BLUE LINE THAT YOU'RE SEEING, THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THAT WOULD BE MIMICKING THE ROAD. SO MIDWAY. AND SO IT WOULD, I MEAN, TO GO FROM 80 TO THAT AREA THERE. IT WOULD BE PRIMARILY USING THE ROAD THAT WAS PUT IN FOR RESIDENTIAL. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GETTING THE IDEA THAT THAT MIDWAY, A FIVE LANE THOROUGHFARE IS JUST BEING BUILT FOR RESIDENTIAL. IT'S NOT.
IT'S BEING BUILT AND COMMERCIAL TO GET ACCESS. AND IT LITERALLY WILL GO FROM RIGHT NOW IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION TO YUKON ROAD FROM BI20, MIDLAND COUNTY SURRENDERED 130FT UP TO BANKHEAD HIGHWAY, AND IT'S NOW INSIDE THE CITY OF ODESSA. THE PROPERTY ON EITHER SIDE IS NOT.
IT'S STILL IN MIDLAND COUNTY, BUT THE ROADWAY IS IN. IN THE CITY OF ODESSA. MIDLAND CONTRIBUTED. MIDLAND COUNTY CONTRIBUTED TO THAT CONSTRUCTION. THEN ODC GAVE MONEY FROM BANKHEAD HIGHWAY UP TO YUKON. OKAY. AND THEN IN THAT SAME AGREEMENT, THEY GAVE MONEY TO BUILD MISSION DRIVE FROM THE END OF THAT CURRENT D.R. HORTON PROJECT THAT WAS
[00:25:05]
UNDER CONSTRUCTION. NOW OVER TWO MIDWAY. RIGHT. SO THAT THAT'S IN THAT'S WHERE THE ODC MONEY IS. OKAY. NOW BEATEN BOW IS BUILDING A WATER LINE TO GO BACK TO THAT BLUE. YEAH. BEATEN BOW IS PART OF THEIR AGREEMENT. AND, AND THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON WITH THE CITY IS BUILDING A WATER LINE. THAT'S WHERE THIS BLUE LINE IS THAT'S REQUIRED FOR ALL OF THIS NEW ANNEXATION.THE CITY STAFF, BASED ON THEIR HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS AND EVERYTHING, SAID THAT NO HOUSES OR ANYTHING CAN BE BUILT UNTIL THIS LINE IS IN ON THE EAST SIDE OF OF MIDWAY AND YUKON, WHICH IS WHERE THEY'RE PROPOSING THEIR RESIDENTIAL. THAT SHOULD NOT AFFECT ANY OF THIS LOT. COMMERCIAL. WELL, THAT LINE'S GOING TO BENEFIT THAT WHOLE REGION OUT THERE.
AND THAT'S WHY THE CITY'S PARTNERING WITH BEATEN BOW TO BUILD THAT. THOSE AGREEMENTS ARE IN CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BEING DRAFTED RIGHT NOW. THAT'S WHY WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT THAT.
WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT NONE OF THIS WILL AFFECT ANY OF THAT IF WE APPROVE IT. YEAH, NO, I DON'T THINK NEGATIVELY AFFECTS IT AT ALL. BUT THE INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES BENEFIT FROM THAT ALREADY BEING PUT OUT. YEAH. ANYBODY ANYTHING BENEFITS FROM FROM FROM FROM THIS ANNEXATION, THAT WATER LINE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE NEW ROADS. YEAH. ALL OF THAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN FOR THAT TAKE PLACE. I WROTE SOMETHING DOWN HERE. IT'S JUST I JUST WANTED SOME MORE CLARIFICATION ON INDUSTRIAL. CORRECT. RIGHT THERE. YEAH. OKAY. SO I HAVE A QUESTION ON THIS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, IF YOU DON'T MIND. SURE. WHAT'S THE, I GUESS, WHAT'S THE REASONING OF BUILDING IT SO MUCH FURTHER OFF OF HIGHWAY 80, JUST LIKE IT IS AWAY FROM THE CURRENT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL RIGHT THERE. WHEN THERE'S LIGHT COMMERCIAL, IT SHOULD IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE APPROVED JUST LIKE IT IS HOW IT'S PRESENTED. RIGHT. BUT HE HAS A QUESTION. YEAH. I'M JUST WONDERING WHY, WHY YOU PUSHED THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL A LITTLE FURTHER TOWARDS YUKON, RATHER THAN HAVING IT BE A LITTLE FURTHER OR A LITTLE CLOSER TO HIGHWAY 80. THE STUFF IN HIGHWAY 80 IS ALREADY BUILT, RIGHT? IT'S OLD, I GET THAT, BUT WHY? WHY PUT A NEW ONE SO FAR AWAY? IT'S NOT INSIDE THE CITY. YEAH, BUT WHY PUT THIS NEW ONE SO FAR AWAY? WELL, THIS IS JUST CONTINUING THAT FOR A A PORTION OF THE DISTANCE. WE'RE NOT GOING ALL THE WAY TO YUKON. BUT LOOKING AT THE MAP EARLIER, THAT WAS LABELED LIGHT COMMERCIAL. WHY HAVE THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL GAPS IN FRONT OF IT AS WELL? WHY? WHY PARCEL IT OUT THAT WAY? I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING. SO WHEN I WAS LOOKING AT A MAP EARLIER, YOU CAN COME LOOK AT MY NOTES I MADE. I DON'T I SAW THIS AS LIKE COMMERCIAL. THIS IS LIGHT COMMERCIAL. THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. NO NO NO NO NO, THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO THIS IS ALL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
YES. AND THEN IT STARTS. THESE ARE WRONG. SO IT WASN'T LABELED ON OURS BUT IT WAS LABELED ON THE SCREEN. THAT'S WHERE MY CONFUSION CAME. YEAH. YOU. THAT WAS MISLABELED. THAT IS LIKE THE IT'S CONTIGUOUS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. IT'S CONTIGUOUS HIGHWAY 80 UP ON ON THAT MIDWAY BOULEVARD ON MIDWAY. YES. NO IT'S WRONG. YEAH, YEAH. OKAY. THAT MAKES A LOT MORE SENSE. IT WAS LABELED INCORRECTLY ON THE, ON THE SCREEN. WELL, WE DON'T HAVE THE LABELS HERE SO NO, WE DID NOT. YEAH, THAT MAKES A LOT MORE SENSE. THANK YOU. GOOD. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'M READY TO MAKE A MOTION. SO IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS IS THERE A MOTION I MOVE TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND THERE'S A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE I ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. WE'RE GOING TO GO CASE FILE NUMBER 202603-Z. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF JOHN BUSHMAN, OWNER, TO ANNEX INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF CITY OF ODESSA, A VACANT 191.03 ACRE TRACT LAND AND TO CONSIDER APPROVAL.
ORIGINAL ZONING REQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED ZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. UPON THE ANNEXATION OF THE 191.03 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 12, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY SURVEY. MIDLAND, TEXAS. MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF INTERSECTION OF YUKON ROAD AND FUTURE MIDWAY BOULEVARD COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO. I'M VERY SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU. I DIDN'T HEAR YOUR VOTE. DID YOU AMEND TO APPROVE? SO YOU'RE OVERRIDING OUR DENIAL? IT WAS. THE MOTION
[00:30:01]
WAS TO APPROVE THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED. NO. PRESENTED. WE'RE MOVING TO APPROVE ALL OF IT.ALL OF IT. ALL OF IT. ALL OF IT AS STAFF RECOMMENDED. NO, NO, BECAUSE YOU HAD TO CHANGE IT.
THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING IT'S RECOMMENDED TO CHANGE BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU'RE APPROVING TO APPROVE IT AS HOW DO YOU WANT TO AMEND? BUT I SEE WE DON'T HAVE. AND WE NEED TO GO BACK.
AND THEN WE'RE WANTING TO. WE'RE WE'RE NOT NEED TO DENY THE MOTION. BUT THEY WILL NEED TO DENY DENY IT AS IT IS AND AMENDED TO, TO. OKAY, THEN WE NEED TO GO BACK TO THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL. YEAH. THAT'S RIGHT. THE WAY WE DID IT IS JUST HOW IT WAS. OKAY, WE NEED TO GO BACK THEN. SO YOU SAW WHAT I WANT BECAUSE I WANTED IT TO SAY LIGHT COMMERCIAL. I WANT IT TO.
I WANT IT TO GO BACK AND BE LIGHT COMMERCIAL. YES. BUT IF YOU DON'T CHANGE THAT, IT READS AS YOU'RE YOU'RE FOLLOWING OUR RECOMMENDATION. I JUST DON'T WANT IT TO GO THAT WAY. SO WE SHOULD RESCIND THE MOTION. I'M GOING TO RESCIND MY MOTION. THERE'S A MOTION TO RESCIND FOR WHICH ONE FOR NUMBER ONE. NUMBER 101 FOR CASE NUMBER 202602-AZ. THERE'S A MOTION TO RESCIND. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND ANY DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR SAY I ANY OBJECTION.
SAME SIGN. MOTION TO RESCIND CASE FILE NUMBER 2020 602-AZ CARRIES. SO NOW I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO KEEP IT IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. NO THE 27. NO. RIGHT. YES.
RECOMMEND. OKAY. SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND KEEP THE 27 ACRES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THE 40 ACRES AND LIGHT COMMERCIAL, CORRECT? YES. AND THEN THE AS IT WAS PETITIONED, AS IT WAS, PETITIONS, ORIGINAL PETITION AND THE SPECIAL DWELLING AND THE SPECIAL DWELLING THAT IN THE SAME. THE 236.93 ACRES IN THE SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. OKAY. SO THERE'S A MOTION FOR 27.57 OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, 40.26 ACRE TRACT OF LIGHT COMMERCIAL AND 236.93 ACRE TRACT, A SPECIAL DWELLING DISTRICT. THERE'S A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? DID YOU GET THE 40? YEAH, I DID THE 40. I DID ALL THREE OF THEM. OKAY, OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.
THERE'S A SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. WE'RE GONNA. OKAY. NOW HEADING OVER TO THE CASE FILE NUMBER 202603AZ. THE APPLICANT, LCA AND OWNER MIDLAND COUNTY ARE REQUESTING AN ORIGINAL DESIGNATION OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF A 24.36 ACRE TRACT STRETCH OF YUKON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, ACTUALLY ON THE RIGHT ONE. YES. LAND USE IN THE AREA CONSISTS OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THE NORTHERN END OF THE SITE, AND VACANT LAND AND OILFIELD RELATED USES ON THE SOUTHERN END. THE SERVICE AGREEMENT IS CURRENTLY IN REVIEW AND IT'S BEING PREPARED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINAL ORIGINAL DESIGNATION OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AS REQUESTED, AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IF THERE'S NO QUESTION, WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THE SECOND OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. YES. STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. JOHN LANDGRAF 521 NORTH TEXAS AVENUE, ODESSA. I'M JUST ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. THIS IS JUST A CONTINUATION OF WORKING WITH MIDLAND COUNTY. THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN'T PROVIDE SERVICE THIS FAR EAST. IT'S ADJACENT TO CITY OF ODESSA. AND SO THEY AGREED TO RELINQUISH THAT RIGHT OF WAY. AND THEY HAVE PETITIONED ODESSA TO ANNEX IT, AND IT WILL BE WIDENED TO AS A. ELIZABETH SAID, IT'LL BE WIDENED TO FIVE LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER AND BE BUILT TO CITY STANDARDS THROUGH ANOTHER ODYSSEY PROJECT. DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE BUILDING THERE? THERE WILL BE ZONING CASES COME. PART OF IT IS IT GOES THROUGH THAT BEATEN TRACK THAT WE HAD, AND THEN WE'LL WAIT AND SEE ON, YOU KNOW, ALL WE'RE DOING IS JUST THE RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT NOW ON THIS CASE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? JUST JUST 130FT OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY IS COMING FROM MIDLAND.
INSTEAD OF BEING A MIDLAND STREET, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A CITY OF ODESSA STREET. OKAY.
[00:35:02]
AND IT'S THE EXISTING YUKON ROAD THAT YOU ALL TAKE TO THE AIRPORT WHEN YOU LEAVE. 191 OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU CLOSE THIS HEARING TO THE PUBLIC, ANY COMMISSIONERS? THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. I'LL SECOND. AND THERE'S A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I I ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 202604AZ. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY LCA ON BEHALF OF MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS. OWNER FOR A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONING DESIGNATION UPON ORGANIZATION INTO CITY LIMITS FOR A VACANT LAND BEING A 16.86 ACRE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PORTION OF YUKON ROAD. SITUATED IN SECTION 12, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY, AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2020-1197 FOR 2020-1197. FIVE OF MIDLAND COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1300FT NORTHEAST OF INTERSECTION OF MISSION DRIVE AND MIDWAY BOULEVARD. COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER AND CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. THE APPLICANT, LCA AND OWNER, MIDLAND COUNTY ARE REQUESTING AN ORIGINAL DESIGNATION OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF A 16.86 ACRE STRETCH OF YUKON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, AND THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF THE OTHER PORTION THAT I HAD JUST PRESENTED A WHILE AGO. OKAY, OKAY. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGNATION OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AS REQUESTED. I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO, I DON'T GUESS SO. NO, WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THIS TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST IT, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. BRETT BERINGER 1201 EAST 87TH STREET, ODESSA, TEXAS. THIS IS THE PORTION OF YUKON THAT FUNDS OUR COMMUNITY. I JUST WANTED TO GO ON RECORD AND SAY WE SUPPORT THIS AND THE PREVIOUS ONE. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? CLOSE THIS SECTION OF MEETING COMMISSIONERS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. AYE. OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-05-Z. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY LCA ON BEHALF OF DJK OWNER OF ANNEX INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF ODESSA OF THE CITY OF ODESSA. A VACANT 231.46 ACRES OF LAND AND TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORIGINAL ZONING REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. SITUATED IN SECTION TWO, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY, MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1310, APPROXIMATELY 1050FT EAST OF BASS PRO DRIVE COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. THE APPLICANT, LCA ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, JC IS REQUESTING ORIGINAL ZONING OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UPON ANNEXATION OF OF APPROXIMATELY 231.46 ACRES INTO THE CITY OF ODESSA. THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST IS TO ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY ZONING CLASSIFICATION PENDING FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THAT THE PROPERTY IS BEING EVALUATED FOR PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER, PROJECT PLANNING AND DUE DILIGENCE REMAIN ONGOING AND A PERMANENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION HAS NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SERVES AS AN INTERIM ZONING DESIGNATION THAT PRESERVES THE PROPERTY'S DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL UNTIL A PERMANENT ZONING DISTRICT IS ESTABLISHED THROUGH A FUTURE PUBLIC HEARING AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION. THE. BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAS. I'M SORRY. THE DISTRICT IS INTENDED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY ZONING LIKE I HAD MENTIONED, BUT BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAS NOT FINALIZED A PROPOSED LAND USE OR DEVELOPMENT PLAN, STAFF FINDS THAT THE DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME. APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONING DOES NOT ESTABLISH FUTURE LAND USE OR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE PROPERTY. PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT WILL REQUIRE TO SUBMIT A SUBSEQUENT ZONING REQUEST FOR PERMANENT ZONING DISTRICT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED LAND USE, LAND USE AND APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS.ACCORDINGLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UPON ANNEXATION. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. EXCUSE ME, I APOLOGIZE. THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION SHOULD CONSIDER APPLICATION, STAFF ANALYSIS, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND PUBLIC TESTIMONY BEFORE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
BASED ON STAFF'S REVIEW, THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS PROVIDED. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
[00:40:03]
THE REQUESTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONING FOR 231.46 ACRES OF TRACK UPON ANNEXATION, THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SERVES AS A TEMPORARY ZONING CLASSIFICATION. APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED ZONING IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DO WE KNOW WHAT'S GOING INTO THAT AREA? WHAT'S PLANNED? THE ONLY HAVE INDICATED MIXED USE. THEY HAVE NOT INDICATED ANY OTHER TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT OR WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING ON THERE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OPEN THIS PART OF THE HEARING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WOULD SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC. WE CAN CLOSE THIS. BEHIND. VESPRO.OKAY, OKAY. OKAY. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND.
ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. THE OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-71-P. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL WITH STAFF RECOMMENDED.
CONDITIONS OF. MERE ADDITION. SECOND, FOLLOWING BEING A .335 ACRE PLOT OF LOTS FOUR AND FIVE BLOCK EIGHT AT EDGEMERE. ADDITION LOCATED IN SECTION 15, BLOCK 42, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY. CITY OF ODESSA, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ADAMS AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 220FT NORTH OF EAST 31ST STREET.
COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. WE DID SEND OUT 27 NOTICES. WE DID GET TWO RETURNS, ONE APPROVAL AND ONE PROTEST. I'LL PASS THE CARD AROUND. THANK YOU. MR. CHAIR.
THE OWNERS, ONE VILLARREAL AND ANGELICA VILLARREAL AND CONSULTANT, RED TAILS ENGINEERING, ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PLOT TO COMBINE TWO LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR OWNERSHIP PURPOSES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESSES ARE 3107 AND 3109 ADAMS AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONS. SECOND FILING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO. I MEAN, DO WE KNOW WHAT THE PURPOSE IS? ARE THEY GOING TO. BUILD A BIGGER HOME ON BOTH LOTS OR SOMETHING? I DID HEAR THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING TO ADD A CARPORT TO THE NEXT LOT, AND ACCORDING TO OUR ZONING CODE, YOU CANNOT HAVE AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE JUST TO OCCUPY A FULL LOT ON ITS OWN. SO BY REPLANTING THE TWO LOTS INTO ONE, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO ATTACH THE CARPORT INTO THE MAIN HOUSE AND THEY ARE READING THE CARPORT OVERLAY ZONE AS WELL. OKAY. MY ONLY CONCERN WOULD BE I'VE, I'VE SEEN THAT IN THE MIDDLE OF A NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY, YOU KNOW, TEAR DOWN WHATEVER IS ON THE SECOND LOT. AND THEY PUT THIS BIG METAL BUILDING THAT I FEEL LIKE IS AN EYESORE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT I GUESS WE HAVE PERMITS AGAINST THAT TYPE OF THING. OR ONCE THEY OWN IT, THEY CAN PUT ANYTHING THERE. SO FAR AS IT IS MEETING THE SETBACKS. AND SO FAR AS AS AS I DID MENTIONED, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES LIKE CARPORT STORAGE STRUCTURES CANNOT BE ON ITS OWN OR AS A MAIN USE ON THE LOT. SO SO FAR AS THEY'VE BEEN ATTACHED TO A LOT AND IT'S BEING SEEN AS SECONDARY TO A MAIN USE ON A LOT. AND SO FAR AS THEY ARE COMPLYING WITH THE APPLICABLE LOT COVERAGE, STANDARDS, SETBACKS, THEN THEY DO QUALIFY.
IF I CAN ADD, IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, WE CAN NOT REGULATE WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL YOU ARE GOING TO BUILD IN. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THIS PART OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WILL SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC. WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE THIS SECTION OF THE MEETING.
COMMISSIONERS GROVE, THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. THERE'S A
[00:45:02]
SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-72-P. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL WITH SEVERAL PERMITTING CONDITIONS OF DEL RIO ANNEX SUBDIVISION. FIRST FILING BEING A 0.21 ACRE REPLAT OF LOTS FOUR AND FIVE BLOCK 11 DEL RIO ANNEX. SECOND FILING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, BLOCK 42 TOWNSHIP, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY. CITY OF ODESSA, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JITTER STREET, APPROXIMATELY 250FT EAST OF SOUTH DIXIE BOULEVARD. COUNCIL DISTRICT ONE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. 14 NOTICES WERE SENT OUT. THREE WERE RETURNED. WE RECEIVED NO PROTEST OR APPROVALS. THE OWNERS, DIANA LONGORIA, PRADO AND ROBERT LONGORIA AND CONSULTANT ELSIE ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PLAT OF TWO LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES. STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR DEL RIO ALEXA DIVISION FIRST FILING, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON YOUR SCREEN. AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SAME. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR PURPOSE IS, BUT OKAY, OKAY.THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS. WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE HEARING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. NOBODY. WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE IT.
COMMISSIONERS MOVE FOR APPROVAL. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? THERE'S A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-73-P. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED. CONDITIONS OF COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES 17. FILING BEING A REPORT OF A DRILL SITE. BLOCK TWO RICHLAND MANOR LOCATED IN SECTION 20, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY. CITY OF ODESSA, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 400FT NORTH OF RICHWOOD ROAD. COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO LET'S SEE, THERE WERE 21 NOTICES SENT OUT. NONE WERE RETURNED, NO PROTESTS WERE RECEIVED AND ONE APPROVAL WAS RECEIVED, WHICH I BROUGHT UP TO THE PODIUM. THE OWNER, LACEY AND ABSHER PROPERTIES, LLC AND CONSULTANT NEWTON ENGINEERING ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A REPLAT TO CREATE THREE LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OUT OF A SINGLE LOT THAT WAS FORMERLY DESIGNATED AS A DRILL SITE.
STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT REQUEST FOR COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES 17TH FILING, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT I'LL HAVE ON YOUR SCREEN SHORTLY. RIGHT THERE. AND I'M HERE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, DO YOU MIND GOING BACK TO THE PICTURE OF THE. THAT WOULD JUST BE BUYING THAT. YES. SO THIS IS A FORMER DRILL SITE. WE DID REZONE IT OR. WELL, YOU GUYS VOTED TO TO REZONE IT A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO. SO IT IS NOW CURRENTLY ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY TWO I BELIEVE. AND THEN THIS DOES MEET ALL THE STANDARDS FOR THAT. THIS WOULD BE WE HAVE RECEIVED THE RELEASE AS WELL FROM CHEVRON ON THE ON THE PROPERTY. SO THEY NO LONGER WISH TO USE IT AS A DRILL SITE.
SO IT'S OPEN FOR DEVELOPMENT. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO QUESTIONS. WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THIS PART OF THE HEARING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WANT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST? STEP FORWARD? NOBODY. WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE IT. COMMISSIONERS MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. THERE'S A SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE I.
OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-74-P. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED. CONDITIONS OF THE REPLAT OF WINDMILL CROFT CROSSING BASIN BEING A REPLAT OF COMMON AREA H WINDMILL CROSSING BASIN AND ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ODESSA, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RAINBOW DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 120FT NORTH OF EAST 100 STREET. COUNCIL DISTRICT FOUR. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO 56 NOTICES WERE SENT OUT. NONE WERE RECEIVED BACK. IN ANY FASHION THAT WE SEE OR THAT I SEE HERE. SO THE OWNER, BEATEN BOW HOMES LLC AND CONSULTANT MAVERICK ENGINEERING ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A REPLAT TO CONSOLIDATE THE REMAINDER OF ONE LOT INTO A NEW LOT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF THE WINDMILL CROSSING BASIN AS PRESENTED. I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. WE'RE GOING TO OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC AND WE'RE GOING TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST. PLEASE STEP FORWARD. NO, THERE'S NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC GOING TO CLOSE IT. THERE'S A MOTION. IS THERE A MOTION ON THE TABLE? THERE'S A
[00:50:04]
MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN.[V. MISCELLANEOUS]
MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-75-P. MOTION TO APPROVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF G, M ONE FIRST EDITION BEING A 0.597 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN SECTION 18, BLOCK 42, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY RAILWAY COMPANY SURVEY. CITY OF ODESSA, ECTOR COUNTY, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 400FT NORTH OF WEST UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD TOWN DISTRICT FIVE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MR. CHAIR, THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THIS ITEM BE TABLED PENDING THE NEXT HEARING. THE REASON BEING IS THE APPLICANT IS IN TALKS WITH LEGAL PENDING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT, SO WOULD LIKE IT TO PUT IT ON HOLD. SO SO DO WE NEED A MOTION TO TABLE. I MOVE TO TABLE. THERE'S A MOTION. I'LL SECOND. SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE. AN OBJECTION. MOTION TO TABLE HAS BEEN GRANTED. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-76-P ETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH SOME RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. J BEING A REPLAY OF NORTHWEST TWO ACRE OF LOT THREE, BLOCK SEVEN. J PARK ESTATES SUBDIVISION OF ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF NORTH CYPRESS AVENUE AND WEST 57TH STREET. EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNER, LUIS RAMON MARQUEZ AND CONSULTANT PIPER SURVEYING ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PLOT TO DIVIDE ONE LOT INTO TWO LOTS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR JBA ESTATES FEED FILING AS PRESENTED. NO CONDITIONS. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE A QUESTION. WHAT? WHAT WOULD EACH LOT BE LIKE? WOULD IT BE BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE WATER? WELL. AND OKAY. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION? THE MOTION IS A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? THERE'S A SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-77-PETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH SEVERAL COMMITTED CONDITIONS, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RED LINE ESTATES.SECOND FILING BEING A 45.26 ACRES IN SECTION FOUR, BLOCK 43, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST MURPHY AND SOUTH RED LINE AVENUE. EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THANK YOU, MISTER CHAIR. SO THE OWNER, EM TEX PROPERTIES LLC AND CONSULTANT MAVERICK ENGINEERING ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH NINE LOTS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT I'LL HAVE ON YOUR SCREEN SHORTLY, AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. IS THERE A MOTION ON THE TABLE MOVE TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. AYE. OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. SO IF THERE'S ANY MORE OF THE CASES, IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? YEAH. THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION?
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.