[I. Call to Order]
[00:00:07]
THIS MEETING TO ORDER. PLEASE STAND UP FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE INDIVISIBLE. ALL RIGHT.
[III. CONSENT ITEMS]
HAVE I HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026 £0.34. THIS IS A CONSENT ITEM. IS THERE A MOTION? MOVE FOR APPROVAL. THERE'S A MOTION SECOND AND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING. CASE[IV. PUBLIC HEARING]
FILE NUMBER 2026-11-Z. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY DJK.INCORPORATED FOR AN ORIGINAL ZONING OF LEE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ON A 37.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 12, BLOCK 41, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY. CITY OF ODESSA. MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE RECENTLY DEDICATED MIDWAY BOULEVARD ON MISSION DRIVE, COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. TWO NOTICES WERE SENT OUT. WE RECEIVED NO. A PROTEST OR NO APPROVALS. THE OWNER, DJ K INC AND APPLICANT MAVERICK ENGINEERING ARE REQUESTING AN ORIGINAL ZONING OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ON A 37.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH SOUTHWEST OF THE RECENTLY DEDICATED MIDWAY BOULEVARD AND MISSION DRIVE. IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND REMAINS VACANT AND UNDEVELOPED.
THE SURROUNDING AREA CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF VACANT LAND WITH PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN ORIGINAL ZONING OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO FACILITATE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. THE PROPOSED. THE PROPOSED ZONING WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN FOR THE AREA. THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ALREADY ESTABLISHED ITS INTENDED LAND USE THROUGH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH D, J K OWNERS INDICATED AS RESOLUTION OR DC 2024, R 20 AND EXHIBIT A, WHICH IDENTIFIES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. INTRODUCING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING AT THIS LOCATION WOULD ALLOW USES THAT MAY BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE PLANNED COMMERCIAL AREA AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, THEREBY DISRUPTING THE ORDERLY TRANSITION OF LAND USES. MAINTAINING ZONING THAT SUPPORT THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GOAL OF PROMOTING COMPATIBLE LAND USES AND PRESERVING THE LONG TERM. THE LONG TERM CHARACTER AND QUALITY OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. FURTHERMORE, THIS AGREEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT THE CITY AND ODC HAVE MADE A POLICY DECISION TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. THE ATTACHED EXHIBITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AGREEMENT IDENTIFIES THE ANTICIPATED LAND USE PATTERN AND INFRASTRUCTURE LAYOUTS FOR THE PROJECT. DOES EXHIBIT DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THEY PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THE CITY'S PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND SUPPORT A FINDING THAT A REQUEST FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. BASED UPON THE PRECEDING ANALYSIS, STAFF RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED, AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, I'M GOING TO OPEN THIS
[00:05:05]
SECTION OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC. ANYBODY WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. OKAY. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. OKAY.THANK YOU. MY NAME IS LEVI BRYANT. 521 NORTH TEXAS. ODESSA, TEXAS, 79761. I'M WITH LC A THE CONSULTANT ON THIS PROJECT. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WAS A PREVIOUS AGREEMENT WITH ODC FOR THAT THAT WAS PROPOSED AS LIGHT COMMERCIAL ON THOSE MASTER PLAN MAPS. THE REASON THAT WE ARE PROPOSING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN THIS AREA IS JUST TO OFFER US SOME OTHER USES THAT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE ALLOWED UNDER LIGHT COMMERCIAL. A COUPLE OF THOSE THAT WOULD BE THAT WE FEEL THAT COUNCIL IS WANTING TO PUSH FOR, AND SOME OF THOSE CONSUMERS THAT WE'D LIKE TO TRY TO INTRODUCE TO THIS AREA ARE EXAMPLES OF LIKE COLD STORAGE EQUIPMENT SUPPLY AND MECHANICAL SHOPS SUCH AS LIKE WORN CAT OR JOHN DEERE. THOSE WOULD OTHERWISE NOT BE ALLOWED UNDER LIGHT COMMERCIAL, BUT WOULD BE UNDER L I. WE UNDERSTAND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL AND WE WOULD PROPOSE SOME DEED RESTRICTIONS ON THIS PROPERTY TO TRY TO HELP A COMPROMISE BETWEEN L, I AND LC IN THIS AREA, JUST AS WE HAVE ON OTHER PAST PROJECTS SUCH AS PARKWAY INDUSTRIAL. AND I HAVE SOME EXAMPLES OF THOSE. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A BUNCH OF SINGLE FAMILY AROUND ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS ZONING CASE, TOO. THERE ARE NATURAL DRAINAGE BUFFERS AND EASEMENTS THAT WE'RE PROPOSING AS WELL. AND WITH THOSE RESTRICTIONS, THERE WOULD BE THINGS SUCH AS NO ODORS OR SOUND POLLUTION, THINGS THAT WE WOULD PUT ON THAT. AND I HAVE SOME EXAMPLES OF THOSE DEED RESTRICTIONS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THOSE AND SOME ADDITIONAL MAPS AS WELL. CAN I PASS THESE OUT? THIS IS JUST A BIGGER OVERVIEW OF THAT AREA AS WELL. I HAVE A QUESTION. DO YOU HAVE HE GETS BACK TO THE. OH I'M SORRY. SO HE COULD BE RECORDED. SURE. YES. YES, MA'AM. SORRY. DO YOU HAVE A PLAN AS TO AVOIDING LIKE 18 WHEELER TRAFFIC USING THE SAME RESIDENTIAL ROAD ROADS? MIDWAY AND MISSION? I WOULDN'T CONSTITUTE AS NECESSARILY. THERE ARE FIVE LANE ROADS, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THE CITY HAS ANY TRUCK ROUTING RESTRICTIONS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE FOR THOSE OTHERWISE, FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL VERSUS LIGHT COMMERCIAL, WE ARE JUST WANTING TO OPEN UP SOME OTHER SPECIFIC USES THAT WE DON'T THINK GO AGAINST WHAT ODC AND THE MASTER PLAN WANT FOR A TAXABLE INCOME BASE THAT HELP FUND THOSE ROAD PROJECTS. WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR SOME ADDITIONAL USES ON TOP OF THE LEA OR ON TOP OF THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL TO THE SOUTH OF BANKHEAD. THERE'S ALREADY HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES, OIL AND GAS THAT'S KIND OF HATCHED IN THAT BLUE THERE. AND SO WE'RE JUST KIND OF WANTING TO SHIFT THAT UP. THEN WE GO TO LIGHT COMMERCIAL AS WE HEAD NORTH TO YUKON ROAD. SO WE'RE TRYING TO USE THIS AS AS KIND OF A BUFFER FROM THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USES SOUTH OF BANKHEAD TO THE, THE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES THAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO THE NORTH AS WELL. DID YOU JUST SAY, DID YOU JUST SAY THAT YOU WOULD TAKE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND SHIFT IT TO LIGHT COMMERCIAL TOWARDS YUKON? IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID? YEAH. SO THE RED IS THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL THAT WE HAVE. SO AS YOU PROGRESS FARTHER NORTH FROM BANKHEAD HIGHWAY, YOU KNOW, WE'D GO FROM THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE THERE TO OUR LEE PROPOSAL AND THEN LIGHT COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL AS YOU PROCEED NORTH TO YUKON ROAD AND 191. IN ADDITION TO ALL OF THIS, THE LEE THAT WE'RE PROPOSING HERE AND AND SOME OTHER LEE ZONINGS THAT WE HAVE PROPOSED AND COMING UP, THAT CONSTITUTES PROBABLY LESS THAN 12% OF THE AREA THAT WE ARE ANNEXING AND BRINGING INTO THE CITY OF ODESSA. SO IT'S NOT A BIG AREA. AND WE FEEL THAT WE HAVE SOME USES THAT WE CAN BRING HERE RATHER THAN THIS, THIS JUST BEING VACANT LAND FOR, YOU KNOW, AN UNFORESEEN TIME. ARE THERE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS I CAN ANSWER? QUESTIONS FOR? AND AGAIN, WE WOULD SUBMIT THESE DEED RESTRICTIONS. AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE COULD AMEND THAT YOU ALL VOTE ON TO APPROVE WITH DEED RESTRICTIONS PER STAFF'S AGREEMENT TO THAT. AND WE'VE SUBMITTED THOSE TO STAFF. THERE'S SOME ARCHITECTURAL THINGS THAT WE LIMIT. THERE HAS
[00:10:05]
TO BE FENCING AND SCREENING. YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WANT IT TO LOOK INDUSTRIAL. WE JUST WANT SOME OF THOSE OTHER USES THAT WE THINK COULD BENEFIT THIS AREA. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, I GUESS WELL, I HAVE A QUESTION. YES. IF IF THE IDEA IS TO BUILD THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT DIRECTION, THEN WHAT I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND INCLUDING OTHER OPPORTUNITIES THERE. YES, MA'AM. YOU KNOW, IF IF WARREN CAT OR SOMEBODY OPENS A MACHINE SHOP THERE, I MEAN, WITH THE DEED RESTRICTION, EVEN INCLUDE LIKE HOW MANY ACRES OF THAT THEY CAN TAKE UP FOR THAT BECAUSE OTHERWISE IT'S GOING TO JUST END UP BEING THE, THE LEE WOULD OR THOSE D RESTRICTIONS WOULD BE LIMITED TO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ZONE NOW CURRENTLY AND ON THIS CASE. OKAY, SO THAT IT WOULD APPLY TO THESE PROPERTIES. AND AGAIN, SIMILARLY, WE HAVE DONE THAT FOR PARKWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK AND LIMITING, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN'T HAVE PAPER MANUFACTURING THAT HAVE SMELL OR ODORS, NO LIGHT PRODUCE OR POLLUTION. DAYTIME OPERATIONS. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST? PLEASE STEP FORWARD. IF THERE'S NOBODY ELSE, WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE THE SECTION OF THE MEETING. COMMISSIONERS. THOUGHTS, MOTIONS. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. YES. QUESTIONS.QUESTIONS. I MEAN, WHEN THEY PETITIONED THIS THEY ARE AWARE THAT THIS THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THIS AREA IS TO BUILD THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WAY. YES. AND TO BE COMMERCIAL, NOT LIKE COMMERCIAL. WAS THAT THE THE RED IN HERE SHOWS AS RETAIL IT'S RETAIL. SO THAT'S WHAT HE MENTIONED AS LIGHT COMMERCIAL LIKE COMMERCIAL. SO WE GO RETAIL. THEN YOU GO INTO LIKE COMMERCIAL, THEN YOU GO INTO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. OKAY. SO RIGHT NOW IT'S PLANNED FOR RETAIL. YES. OKAY. SO MAYBE THEY COULD SUGGEST LIGHT COMMERCIAL TO BRING IN A LITTLE BIT MORE DIVERSITY IN THERE, BUT MAYBE NOT. I THINK THEY HAD LOOKED AT LIKE COMMERCIAL BEFORE, BUT I THINK IT DIDN'T ALLOW THEM TO ALLOW FOR THE BUSINESSES THAT THEY'RE CURRENTLY TALKING TO WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GO THERE WITH LIGHT COMMERCIAL. BUT WE CAN ALSO THE WE CAN ALSO DO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS IN WHERE IT TIES IT SPECIFIC TO LIKE A SITE PLAN. OKAY. OKAY. AND EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE WILLING TO DO THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, THAT'S A CIVIL. I CANNOT ENFORCE THOSE DEED RESTRICTIONS AS AS PART OF THE CITY, I CAN ONLY ENFORCE OUR ORDINANCE. SO THEY JUST. ALL I CAN SAY IS THERE'S A DEED RESTRICTION. YOU HAVE TO COMPLY TO BOTH LAWS. BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT I CANNOT ISSUE THEM A PERMIT, BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE A CIVIL THING AND SOMEBODY ELSE WOULD HAVE TO SUE THEM IF THEY'RE NOT COMPLYING TO THAT, I SEE, OKAY, COMMISSIONERS. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? IN CITY COUNCIL WOULD REVIEW THIS AS WELL. CORRECT. SO IF YOU GUYS VOTE TO TO GO WITH US WITH OUR RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL, THEY STILL HAVE THE OPTION TO APPEAL AND GO TO CITY COUNCIL. OKAY, OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DENY AS SUGGESTED BY STAFF. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
THERE'S A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. SIDE. I MEAN, I ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. YOU NEED TO ANSWER THAT AGAIN. OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR SAY I I ANY OBJECTION.
SAME SIGN ANY OBJECTION. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. MOTION HAS BEEN DENIED. ALL RIGHT.
[V. MISCELLANEOUS]
WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-66-PETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF[00:15:02]
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. CALLOUS TURNER SECOND FILING BEING A 39.5 ACRE REPLAT OF LOT TWO, BLOCK ONE. CALLOUS TURNER LOCATED IN SECTION 22, BLOCK 43, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH MOCKINGBIRD LANE AND WEST SYCAMORE DRIVE. EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNER, ECTOR COUNTY AND CONSULTANT LCA ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A REPORT FOR CALLOUS TURNER PARK. STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR CALLOUS TURNER SECOND FILING, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. MR. CHAIR, IF YOU PERMIT ME, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A CORRECTION ON THE FLOOR. OKAY, SO AS OF MONDAY 13TH JULY, LCA HAS BEEN ABLE TO MEET ALL CONDITIONS, SO THERE WILL BE NO CONDITIONS TO GO BY THIS TIME AROUND. OKAY? OKAY. SO THE CONDITIONS. YES, THEY MET ALL CONDITIONS. ALL I. ALL RIGHT. STAFF. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. MOVE FOR APPROVAL. THERE'S A MOTION. THERE'S A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES TO THAT.
CASE. FILE NUMBER 2026-67-PETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.
WESTGATE ACRES SUBDIVISION SEVENTH FILING BEING A REPLAY OF LOTS 18, 19 AND 20 BLOCK FIVE WEST K EIGHT ACRES SUBDIVISIONS LOCATED IN SECTION 13, BLOCK 43 TOWNSHIPS, TWO SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY SURVEY. ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH BUCKNELL AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 230FT SOUTH OF WEST SECOND STREET.
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNERS, MARIO ROSARIO LUJAN AND NATIONAL PROMISED LAND, LLC AND CONSULTANT MAVERICK ENGINEERING, ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A REPLAT GOING FROM THREE LOT TO FOUR LOT FOR OWNERSHIP PURPOSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR WESTGATE ACRES SEVEN FILING, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO, SO I SEE THAT IT COULD IT WOULD PROVIDE WATER FOR THOSE SIGNS. LOTS. IF THEY HAVE TO HAVE A SEPTIC PUT IN, USUALLY IT'S LIKE THEY HAVE RULES OF HOW FAR THAT CAN BE FROM A PRIVATE WATER. WELL, WOULD THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE BASED ON THE COUNTY RULES TO PUT A SEPTIC IN EACH ONE? I BELIEVE SO I WOULDN'T BE SURE, SIR. WHAT'S THAT? I BELIEVE SO. YOU BELIEVE SO? OKAY. THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION ON THOSE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION? MOVE FOR APPROVAL. MOTION TO TABLE. JUST A SECOND. SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-68-P. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. THE SHORT FORM PLAT OF BRAVO ADDITION AND ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ODESSA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 0.38 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION TEN, BLOCK TWO, BLOCK 42, TOWNSHIP TWO SOUTH TO SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COUNTY SURVEY. ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 52ND STREET, APPROXIMATELY 148FT WEST OF LANCASTER DRIVE, COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNERS, COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK AND BRAVO REALTY LLC AND CONSULTANTS S W HARWELL, INC. AS REQUESTED APPROVAL OF A SHORT FORM PLAT TO CREATE ONE LOTS FOR OWNERSHIP PURPOSES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESSES 302 EAST 52ND STREET. STAFF
[00:20:09]
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SHORT FORM PLAT OF BRAVO ADDITION, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN, AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, IS THERE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.THERE'S A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-69-PETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL SITES. FIFTH FILING BEING A REPORT OF A 6.90 ACRE TRACT OUT OF LOTS ONE AND TWO BLOCK 13 SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL SITES LOCATED IN SECTION 44, BLOCK 42, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY SURVEY. ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST BELL STREET, APPROXIMATELY 465FT OF SOUTH FULTON AVENUE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNER, HENRY LOUIS SMITH MARTIN, WITH REPRESENTATIVE SUSAN JANE MARTIN AND CONSULTANT S W HOWELL, INC. ARE REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLOT TO CREATE TWO LOTS FOR OWNERSHIP PURPOSES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL SITE FEED FILING, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. AND I'M HERE FOR QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. MOTIONS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. THERE'S A SECOND DISCUSSION.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. CASE FILE NUMBER 2026-70-PETJ. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. WESTOVER ACRES 13TH.
FILING BEING A REPORT OF A PORTION OF LOT ONE, BLOCK 37, WESTOVER ACRES. FIFTH FILING LOCATED IN SECTION 28, BLOCK 43, TOWNSHIP TWO, SOUTH TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY, ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH MOSS AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 229FT SOUTH OF WEST DOWN STREET. EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE OWNER, CANADIAN GUERRILLA, INC. AND CONSULTANT R TO M ENGINEERING, ARE SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PLOT TO CREATE ONE LOTS FOR OWNERSHIP PURPOSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST FOR WESTOVER ACRES 13TH FILING, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ON THE SCREEN, AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. IS THERE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OBJECTION? MOTION CARRIES. IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND. NO DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR. SAY AYE I.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.